.png)
Keep the half hour you already run.
No new ritual and no extra meeting. Hatch sits alongside the half hour a manager and a person already spend together each week.
The Record · Continuous evidence of contribution
A record of who contributed what. Continuous, and defensible.
Agents can read Slack, tickets and the repo. They cannot read the half hour a week where someone explains why the plan changed, or what they raised and nobody acted on. Hatch keeps all of it as one continuous record of contribution.
CadenceThe 1:1 you already run
InputWhat was actually said
FormsNone
# captured in this week's 1:1s Context team, what changed, who raised it as owner, the reason as evidence From the conversation Where the plan changed and the reason was said out loud 'this week' Grouped by team, person Ordered by most recent first
Team
What changed
Source
Status
Product
Scope cut for the quarter
1:1
Linked
Engineering
Blocker raised, owner named
1:1
Linked
Support
Agent now handles tier one
Team meeting
Linked
Sales
Deal slipped, reason recorded
1:1
Linked
Finance
Hiring paused, work rerouted
Team meeting
Linked
Captured in conversation, not in a form
Updated after every 1:1
Built for founders, CFOs and COOs
How it works
Three moves, no new admin.
Capture what was actually said.
Decisions, blockers, scope changes and the reasoning behind them, in the manager's own words rather than a dropdown.
Connect it to the work itself.
That context joins what Hatch already reads across your tools, so a plan that changed in conversation shows up against the work it changed.
Capabilities
A record that holds up.
Raised
1.7notes
Decided
3.9notes
Linked
412k/s
Context captured · last 8 weeks
notes
One thread per person.
Every conversation sits in order against the same person, so last quarter's reasoning is still there when you need it.
stream.orders
stream.payments
orders_enriched
api / v1
Trace any decision to where it was made.
Open a change and see when it was raised, who raised it and what was said at the time.
Every manager, one cadence.
Managers keep running their own 1:1s. Hatch keeps the shape consistent without telling anyone what to say.
Questions that move with the work.
Change what you ask without losing the history behind the earlier answers.
What was raised, and when.
Look back at any week and read what people said at the time, including the constraint someone named before it showed up as a missed date.
Said once, counted once.
A blocker raised in a 1:1 and the same blocker sitting in a ticket resolve to one thing, not two.
The reason
Why Hatch exists.
Case · Plans that changed
Evidence, not recollection.
Imran Syed founded Hatch after selling Instapage. At Instapage he had to run three reductions in force, and each time he made the call on very little data: tenure, team, a manager's impression. Good people left who should not have. When you have to defend a decision about people, you need a record of who contributed what. Most companies do not have one.
- The decision, the date and the reason in one place
- Updated the week the plan actually moves
- Readable months later, without asking anyone to remember
Decision recorded in the 1:1
Reason attached to the work
Case · Blockers
Blockers surface in the week they appear.
People say what is in the way long before it shows up as a missed date. Hatch carries that forward to whoever can clear it.
- Raised by the person closest to the work
- Routed to whoever can actually clear it
- Tracked until it is closed, not just logged
Raised to the right person
Follow-up tracked to close
Case · The agent layer
Give your agents the half they cannot read.
Agents read Slack, tickets and the repo. Hatch adds the reasoning behind the work, so what the agent layer returns can be judged against what the team was actually trying to do.
- The reasoning your agents have no way to read
- Access follows your own reporting lines
- Agent output sits beside the intent behind it
Context source the conversation
Agent work measured beside it
Case · Team cadence
Many managers, one readable picture.
Every team runs its own rhythm. Hatch reads across all of them and shows a founder, CFO or COO where the work is actually moving.
- Every team's rhythm, read on its own terms
- History kept for as long as you need it
- One readable picture for the people making the call
Teams covered all of them
Admin added none
What changes
What leaders get back.
1:1s covered
All
One continuous record of contribution, per person, across every team.
Why the plan changed
Kepton record
The reason sits beside the plan it changed, not in someone's memory.
Surveys to send
Zero
No forms and no survey round. Nothing for anyone to fill in.
Extra meetings
None
Hatch reads the cadence you already run before anyone changes a habit.
What we hear
Teams that stopped guessing.
“The ticket says the date moved. Nobody can tell me why, and the person who knew has already moved on to the next thing.”
What we hear
From founders, CFOs and COOs
“We hear about a blocker three weeks after it starts costing us. It was raised in a 1:1 the week it appeared.”
What we hear
From founders, CFOs and COOs
“We can price the agent layer to the cent. What it returned against what the team was trying to do is still a guess.”
What we hear
From founders, CFOs and COOs
FAQ
Before you start.
Does this add another meeting?
No. Hatch works with the 1:1s your managers already run. Nothing new goes on the calendar and nobody has to prepare for it.
Do managers have to change how they run 1:1s?
No. The conversation stays theirs. Hatch keeps the record and connects it to the work, so the half hour leaves behind something more durable than a shared memory.
Is this a survey tool?
No. There are no forms and no survey rounds. Hatch reads the conversations and the work already happening, which is why there is nothing for anyone to fill in.
Who can see what was said?
Access follows your own reporting lines. Hatch surfaces patterns to leaders. It does not rate or rank anyone publicly, and it never makes the decision for you.
What does this give the agent layer?
The reasoning agents cannot read. Hatch connects what a team decided and why to what your tools and your agents returned, so the two can be judged together.
Find out
Find out what you actually have.
Thirty days, one named engineer, and a readout of what your team and your agents actually produced. $2,500, credited in full against your first year.