.png)
What the agent layer actually returned.
Adoption is easy to show: seats, calls, tokens consumed. Return is the harder number. Hatch sets what the agent layer produced against what it cost, team by team, so you can see which teams get real leverage and which are just paying for it.
Four chapters. One honest number.
The bill arrives undivided.
Agent spend lands in the cloud bill as one line with nobody's name on it. Hatch attributes it down to the team and the work it produced, so the cost finally has somewhere to sit.
Return, not adoption.
Seats, calls and tokens tell you the agent layer is being used. They do not tell you what came back. Hatch counts the output that landed and sets it against the spend that produced it.
Leverage, team by team.
Two teams on the same spend rarely get the same return. Hatch shows which teams convert agent spend into throughput and which are carrying the cost without the output to show for it.
Every number has a source.
Open any figure and see the work it came from and the spend it is set against. Hatch surfaces patterns to leaders. It never rates, ranks publicly, or decides.
Eight things we can state plainly.
Agent spend is attributed to the work it produced.
Nobody on your team is asked to complete anything.
Hatch connects to the tools you already run.
Patterns go to leaders. People are never ranked in public.
Customer data is never used to train models.
Data encrypted in transit and at rest.
Built on nine peer-reviewed meta-analyses and 2,200 behavioral profiles.
Your organization retains ownership at all times.
These are properties of how Hatch works, not performance benchmarks. Biometric data belongs to the individual alone and is never visible to a manager.
Hatch vs the usage dashboard.
Three ways to find out what the agent layer is doing for you. Only one of them puts the output next to the bill.
| What you get | HatchReads the work | Usage dashboardSent to everyone | Skip-level meetingsBooked by hand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timeliness | Continuous | Once a quarter | When calendars allow |
| Work added for the team | None | A form each | A meeting each |
| Covers everyone | Yes | Only who responds | Only who is invited |
| History | Tracks a theme over time | Snapshots, far apart | Lives in notes |
| Candour | Reads what was already said | Depends on the form | Depends on the room |
| Systems to run | 1 | Seat and token counts | Calendar and notes |
| Who it lands on | Leaders | Someone to chase it | Managers to relay it |
Hatch surfaces patterns to leaders; it never rates, ranks publicly, or decides.
“The constraint is rarely a mystery to the people inside it. It is usually sitting in a message thread from three weeks ago, said once, by someone who assumed it had been heard.”
Signals a leader can act on.
The details, for the record.
What it reads
- Sources
- Tools you already run
- Covers
- Messages, tickets, docs
- Conversation layer
- 1:1s and team meetings
- Setup
- No migration
- Asked of the team
- Nothing
- Consent
- Required to name anyone
How it reads it
- Output
- Themes and patterns
- Cadence
- Continuous
- Grounding
- Nine peer-reviewed meta-analyses
- Profiles behind it
- 2,200 behavioral profiles
- Dimensions
- Eight behavioral
- Traceable to
- The work it came from
Who sees it
- Audience
- Founders, CFOs, COOs
- Public ranking
- Never
- Decides outcomes
- No, people do
- Biometric data
- The individual's alone
- Security
- SOC 2 Type II, encrypted
- Data ownership
- Yours at all times
Hatch is aligned to the EU AI Act and operated by Hatchproof Inc. Security teams are welcome to review before anything is connected.
Find out what you actually have.
Thirty days, one named engineer, and a readout of what your team and your agents actually produced. $2,500, credited in full against your first year.